Wednesday 20 January 2016

Unit 5 sec 5.1 solutions of equations

Unit 5 sec 5.1 solutions of equations
20 January 2016
22:37
As you saw earlier, an equation consists of two expressions, with an equals sign between them. Here’s an example:
2(r + 3) = 5r 6.
The expressions to the left and right of the equals sign in an equation are referred to as the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS),
respectively.
LHS = 2(r + 3) and RHS = 5r 6.
This section is about equations that contain an unknown – a letter representing a number that you don’t know. For example, earlier you saw the equation
3
10N = 150,
where N is an unknown representing the number of children who applied to a school. It turned out that N = 500, because equation) is correct
when you substitute 500 for N:

3 × 500 = 150.
10
The process of finding the value of the unknown in an equation is called solving the equation, and the value found is called a solution of the equation. We also say that this value satisfies the equation.

Example 18 Checking a solution of an equation
Show that r = 4 is a solution of the equation
2(r + 3) = 5r 6.
Solution
If r = 4, then
LHS = 2(4 + 3) = 2 × 7 = 14
and
RHS = 5 × 4 6 = 20 6 = 14.
Since LHS = RHS, r = 4 is a solution.
When you check whether a number is a solution of an equation, you should set out your working in a similar way to Example 18. Evaluate the left and right-hand sides separately, and check whether each side gives the
same answer.
 If one side of the equation is a constant term, then you just need to evaluate the other side, and check whether you get the right number. You can set out your working in the way shown in Example 19 below.

Example 19 Checking a solution of another equation
Show that x = 2 is a solution of the equation
1
2 (x + 8) = 3.
Solution
If x = 2, then
LHS = 1 (2 + 8) = 1 × 6 = 3 = RHS.
           2                2
Hence x = 2 is a solution.

It’s possible for an equation to have more than one solution. For example, the equation a2 = 4 has two solutions, a = 2 and a = 2, because 22 = 4
and (2)2 = 4. It’s also possible for an equation to have no solution at all. For example, the equation a2 = 1 has no solution, because squaring a real number always gives a non-negative answer.




Unit 5 sec 4.3 using algebra

Unit 5 sec 4.3 using algebra
20 January 2016
22:07

To do this, you carry out the trick starting with a letter (n, say), which represents any number at all. After each step you simplify the resulting expression.
Notice that it was important to include the brackets when the expression 2n + 7 was doubled in the above calculation. Doubling 2n + 7 does not give 2 × 2n + 7 = 4n + 7; the correct calculation is
2(2n + 7) = 4n + 14.

Example 16 Finding and simplifying a formula
Each week Arthur works for at least 37 hours. He’s paid £15 per hour for
the first 37 hours, and £25 per hour for each additional hour. Find a
formula for P, where £P is Arthur’s pay for the week if he works for
n hours.
Solution
Arthur’s pay in £ for the first 37 hours is
37 × 15 = 555.
The number of additional hours that Arthur works is n 37, so his pay
in £ for these additional hours is
(n 37) × 25 = 25(n 37).
The question states that Arthur works for at least 37 hours, so there’s
no need to worry about n 37 going negative.
So a formula for Arthur’s pay is
P = 555 + 25(n 37).
The formula can be simplified by multiplying out the brackets:
P = 555 + 25n 925
= 25n 370.
So the simplified formula is
P = 25n − 370.

Example 17 Proving a property of numbers
Prove that the sum of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 3.
Solution
Represent the first of the three integers by n. Then the other two integers
are n + 1 and n + 2. So their sum is
n + (n + 1) + (n + 2) = n + n + 1 + n + 2
Dividing by 3 gives
3n + 3    = 3n   + 3 = n + 1.
   3            3       3
Now n + 1 is an integer, because n is an integer. So dividing the sum of

the three numbers by 3 gives an integer. That is, the sum is divisible by 3.

Unit 5 sec 4.2 Algebraic fraction

Unit 5 sec 4.2 Algebraic fraction
20 January 2016
01:44

Similarly, the expression
(8a + 3) ÷ (2a)
can be written in fraction notation as
8a + 3
2a.
The brackets can be omitted because the fraction notation makes it clear
that the whole of 8a + 3 is divided by 2a.
The expressions above and below the line in an algebraic
fraction are called the numerator and denominator, respectively, just as
they are for ordinary fractions.
(8a + 3) ÷ (2a) should be written as
8a + 3
2a
, not
8a + 3
2a
Try not to use division signs in expressions, or whenever you carry out algebraic manipulation, from now on; use fraction notation instead.
However, occasionally it’s useful to use division signs in algebraic expressions, just as occasionally it’s useful to use multiplication signs.
As with multiplying out brackets, this technique doesn’t necessarily simplify an expression; it just gives a different way of writing it. It applies to algebraic fractions where there’s more than one term in the numerator, such as
2a 5b + c
3d
Since dividing by something is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal,
you can write this expression as
1
3d
(2a 5b + c).
You can then multiply out the brackets to give
2a
3d
5b
3d
+
c
3d
If you compare expressions (6) and (7), you can see that the overall effect is that each term on the numerator has been individually divided by the denominator. This is called expanding the algebraic fraction.
Once an algebraic fraction has been expanded, it may be possible to simplify some of the resulting terms, as illustrated in the next example

Example 15 Expanding an algebraic fraction
Expand the algebraic fraction
10x + x2 8
       x
.
Solution
10x + x2 8    = 10x      +     −  8   = 10 + x 8
              X                x          x       x                    x




Tuesday 19 January 2016

Unit 5 sec 4.1 Multiplying out brackets

Unit 5 sec 4.1 Multiplying out brackets
20 December 2015
23:06

Any expression that contains brackets, such as
8a + 3b(b 2a)
or
(2m + 3n) (m + n 3r),
can be rewritten without brackets. To see how to do this, let’s start by
looking at an expression that involves only numbers:
(2 + 3) × 4.
When you learned to collect like terms, you saw that 2 + 3 batches of
4 dots is the same as 2 batches of 4 dots plus 3 batches of 4 dots, as
illustrated in Figure 4. So (2 + 3) × 4 is equivalent to
2 × 4 + 3 × 4.
Here an expression containing brackets has been rewritten as an expression
without brackets:
(2 + 3) × 4 2 × 4 + 3 × 4
 (2 + 3) ×4 = 2 × 4 + 3 × 4.
It’s usual to write numbers in front of brackets, so let’s write the 4 first in
each multiplication:
4(2 + 3) = 4× 2 + 4 × 3.
Here you can see how to rewrite an expression with brackets as one
without brackets: you multiply each of the numbers inside the brackets
individually by the number outside the brackets. This is called
multiplying out the brackets, expanding the brackets, or simply
removing the brackets. The number outside the brackets is called the
multiplier. Here’s another example, with multiplier 7.
7(1 +5) = 7× 1 + 7 × 5
Multiplying out the brackets can be particularly helpful for expressions
that contain letters. The rule above applies in just the same way.
Strategy To multiply out brackets
Multiply each Remember that you must term inside the brackets by the multiplier.
multiply every term inside the
brackets, not just the first term.
Here are two examples, with multipliers a and 3, respectively.
a(b + c) = ab + ac
3(p + q2 + r) = 3p + 3q2 + 3r
It doesn’t matter whether the multiplier is before or after the brackets.
Here’s an example of multiplying out where the multiplier is after the
brackets:
(x + y)z = xz + yz.
If you prefer the multiplier to be before the brackets, then you can change
the order before multiplying out. For example,
(x + y)z = z(x + y) = zx + zy = xz + yz.
When you multiply out brackets, you often need to simplify the resultingterms, as illustrated in the next example.

Example 11 Multiplying out brackets
Multiply out the brackets in the following expression:
Tutorial clip
2a(3a + 2b).
Solution
2a(3a + 2b) = 2a × 3a + 2a × 2b
= 6a2 + 4ab

Once you’re familiar with how to multiply out brackets, it’s usually best to
simplify the terms as you multiply out, instead of first writing down an
expression containing multiplication signs. This leads to tidier expressions
and fewer errors.
For example, if you look at the expression in Example 11,
2a(3a + 2b),
you can see that when you multiply out the brackets, the first term will be
2a times 3a. You simplify this to 6a2, using the strategy of first finding the
sign, then the rest of the coefficient and then the letters, and write it down. Then you see that the second term is 2a times +2b, simplify this
to +4ab, and write it down after the first term. This gives
2a(3a + 2b) = 6a2 + 4ab.
Simplifying the terms at the same time as multiplying out is particularly
helpful when some of the terms inside the brackets, or the multiplier, have
minus signs. For example, let’s multiply out the brackets in the expression
3m(2m + 3n 6).
The first term is 3m times 2m, which simplifies to 6m2. Working out
the other terms in a similar way, we obtain
3m(2m + 3n 6) = 6m2 + 9mn 18m.
Example 12 Multiplying out brackets involving minus signs
Multiply out the brackets in the following expression:
Tutorial clip
a(b a + 7).
Solution
a(b a + 7) = ab + a2 7a
An expression containing brackets may have more than one term. For
example, the expression
x(y + 1) + 2y(y + 3)
has two terms, each containing brackets, as follows:
x(y + 1) + 2y(y + 3) .
An expression like this can be dealt with term by term, using a similar
Strategy To multiply out brackets in an expression with more than one term
1. Identify the terms. Each term after the first starts with a plus or
minus sign that isn’t inside brackets.
2. Multiply out the brackets in each term. Include the sign (plus or minus) at the start of each resulting term.
3. Collect any like terms.
Example 13 Expanding the brackets when there’s more than one term
 (a) x(y + 1) + 2y(y + 3) (b) 2r2 r(r s)
Solution
(a) Identify the terms. Multiply out the brackets. Then check for like
terms – there are none here.
x(y + 1) + 2y(y + 3) = xy + x + 2y2 + 6y
(b) Identify the terms. Multiply out the brackets. Collect like
terms.
2r2 r(r s) = 2r2 r2 + rs
= r2 + rs
Some expressions, such as
(a + 2b c),
contain brackets with just a minus sign in front.
You can remove these brackets by using the fact that a minus sign in front
is just the same as multiplying by 1:
(a + 2b c) = 1(a + 2b c)
= a 2b + c.
You can see that the overall effect is that the sign of each term in the
brackets has been changed.
An expression may also contain brackets with just a plus sign in front.
These brackets can be removed by using the fact that a plus sign in front is
just the same as multiplying by 1. For example, the expression
2x + (y 3z)
can be simplified as follows:
2x + (y 3z) = 2x + 1(y 3z)
= 2x + y 3z.
This time you can see that the effect is that all the signs in the brackets
remain as they are.
Strategy To remove brackets with a plus or minus sign in front
If the sign is plus, keep the sign of each term inside the brackets
the same.
If the sign is minus, change the sign of each term inside the
brackets.
Example 14 Plus and minus signs in front of brackets
Remove the brackets in the following expressions.
 (a) (P2 + 2Q 3R) (b) a + (2bc d)
Solution
(a) (P2 + 2Q 3R) = +P2 2Q + 3R
= P2 2Q + 3R
(b) a + (2bc d) = a + 2bc d
Some expressions, such as
(x + 2)(x 5),
contain two, or even more, pairs of brackets multiplied together.
The second form of this expression is clearly simpler than the first:
it’s shorter and easier to understand, and
it’s easier to evaluate for any particular value of x.
These are the attributes to aim for when you try to write an expression in
a simpler way.
However, sometimes it’s not so clear that one way of writing an expression
is better than another. For example,
x(x + 1) is equivalent to x2 + x.
Both these forms are reasonably short, and both are reasonably easy to
evaluate. So this expression doesn’t have a simplest form.
The same is true of many other expressions. One form might be better
for some purposes, and a different form might be better for other purposes.

In particular, multiplying out the brackets in an expression doesn’t always simplify it.